Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques
I apologize if this has been covered before, but I found this study interesting to the point that I might modify my study methods, and I was wondering what you think of it.
A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3158
- Contact:
A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by leosmith on Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
9 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
- Xenops
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 10:33 pm
- Location: Boston
- Languages: English (N), Danish (A2), Japanese (rusty), Nansha (constructing)
On break: Japanese (approx. N4), Norwegian (A2) - Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... 15&t=16797
- x 3583
- Contact:
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
Beautiful timing for this article! Not only is it relevant to language learning, but also my current courses! Many thanks to you, leosmith!
1 x
Check out my comic at: https://atannan.com/
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3158
- Contact:
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
Xenops wrote:Beautiful timing for this article! Not only is it relevant to language learning, but also my current courses! Many thanks to you, leosmith!
Haha - I got it from here:
Xenops wrote:Here's an article about learning multiple things at once: https://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2016/10/14/focus-or-parallel/?inf_contact_key=641ae704c8b2a776428d6eb63dc732bb1b16b264fb0ff1baa64e1a5418b957aa
So thanks to you, Xenops!
1 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
-
- x 7661
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3158
- Contact:
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
Marais wrote:Any chance of a summary?
Did you read the tables? Apparently practice testing and distributed practice kick ass.
0 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
-
- x 7661
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
leosmith wrote:Marais wrote:Any chance of a summary?
Did you read the tables? Apparently practice testing and distributed practice kick ass.
Those tables make no sense to me.
Can anyone summarise what they mean in normal language that laymen can understand?
0 x
- reineke
- Black Belt - 3rd Dan
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:34 pm
- Languages: Fox (C4)
- Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=6979
- x 6554
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
I remember this study. I also remember sharing this neat summary:
http://tguilfoyle.cmswiki.wikispaces.net/file/view/What_works,_What_doesn't.pdf
Keep in mind that the study is about general learning techniques. Language learning is mentioned in relation to vocabulary study. What works for a history class may not work well in language learning and vice versa. Generally speaking language learning theory is complex and resistant to easy solutions.
"Rereading" to learn some facts for a history class is different from repeated reading which aims to develop reading fluency and foster vocabulary growth.
http://tguilfoyle.cmswiki.wikispaces.net/file/view/What_works,_What_doesn't.pdf
Keep in mind that the study is about general learning techniques. Language learning is mentioned in relation to vocabulary study. What works for a history class may not work well in language learning and vice versa. Generally speaking language learning theory is complex and resistant to easy solutions.
"Rereading" to learn some facts for a history class is different from repeated reading which aims to develop reading fluency and foster vocabulary growth.
Last edited by reineke on Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
5 x
-
- Green Belt
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:39 pm
- Languages: English (N), French (B1), German (A2), Latin (eternal beginner), Dutch (Aspires to find the time).
- x 645
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
So we need more self testing and spaced repetition - ermmm, that's called Pimsleur - No?
0 x
-
- Black Belt - 3rd Dan
- Posts: 3532
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:04 am
- Location: Scotland
- Languages: English(N)
Advanced: French,Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Intermediate: Italian, Catalan, Corsican
Basic: Welsh
Dabbling: Polish, Russian etc - x 8809
- Contact:
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
Elexi wrote:So we need more self testing and spaced repetition - ermmm, that's called Pimsleur - No?
Pimsleur uses these principles, which is where it gets it strength from, and why it is effective despite its flaws. But there is more to teaching and learning than these two principles!
0 x
-
- Green Belt
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:39 pm
- Languages: English (N), French (B1), German (A2), Latin (eternal beginner), Dutch (Aspires to find the time).
- x 645
Re: A study that rates effectiveness of various learning techniques.
I forgot that sarcasm rarely travels over the internet
3 x
Return to “General Language Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests