Total Physical Response (TPR)

General discussion about learning languages
User avatar
reineke
Black Belt - 3rd Dan
Posts: 3570
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:34 pm
Languages: Fox (C4)
Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=6979
x 6554

Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby reineke » Tue Feb 26, 2019 6:13 pm

---
Last edited by reineke on Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 x

Lawyer&Mom
Blue Belt
Posts: 980
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 6:08 am
Languages: English (N), German (B2), French (B1)
Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=7786
x 3767

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby Lawyer&Mom » Tue Feb 26, 2019 8:32 pm

We did this at my Uni for beginning German. Probably only the first week or so, but the class was taught 100% in German and we had to start somewhere! So, “stand up,” “raise your hands,” “spin around” etc. Instructor demonstrated and we all followed along. It was fun!
2 x
Grammaire progressive du français -
niveau debutant
: 60 / 60

Grammaire progressive du francais -
intermédiaire
: 25 / 52

Pimsleur French 1-5
: 3 / 5

User avatar
Iversen
Black Belt - 4th Dan
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:36 pm
Location: Denmark
Languages: Monolingual travels in Danish, English, German, Dutch, Swedish, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan, Italian, Romanian and (part time) Esperanto
Ahem, not yet: Norwegian, Afrikaans, Platt, Scots, Russian, Serbian, Bulgarian, Albanian, Greek, Latin, Irish, Indonesian and a few more...
Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1027
x 14962

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby Iversen » Tue Feb 26, 2019 8:35 pm

I would add my own physical response: to leave the room as fast as possible
8 x

languist
Orange Belt
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:55 pm
Languages: English (N)
Learning: Mostly, how to procrastinate + French, Spanish, Darija, Russian, Slovak, Circassian, Greek
Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=7523
x 368

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby languist » Tue Feb 26, 2019 9:35 pm

I love it for teaching children! I broadly agree with the idea that we should learn the bulk of the language through experience and play anyway, but of course it’s even more relevant to children. This kind of approach doesn’t really work with teaching adults in the long term, but I think every language course for children should use this, including the first few classes for older children, if only to emphasise that a language is used for practical communication, not only as a subject to be studied in school.

In fact, for the first lesson with a group of children I don’t even like to teach the actual language. First, we make fools of ourselves and use nonsense language to communicate meaning, to demonstrate the idea that learning a language is, by nature, kind of silly (forcing your mouth to make new shapes and noises), and also accessible - you can discover the meaning through context if you try! The learning of the real words attached to those contexts then comes through exposure and repetition. I guess it works for adults too, but that they would feel too awkward and are usually learning concepts far above the scope of this method.
1 x

User avatar
zenmonkey
Black Belt - 2nd Dan
Posts: 2528
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: California, Germany and France
Languages: Spanish, English, French trilingual - German (B2/C1) on/off study: Persian, Hebrew, Tibetan, Setswana.
Some knowledge of Italian, Portuguese, Ladino, Yiddish ...
Want to tackle Tzotzil, Nahuatl
Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=859
x 7030
Contact:

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby zenmonkey » Tue Feb 26, 2019 11:34 pm

Makes me think of Prof. A.'s Shadowing technique which had a physical component.
Also makes me think of shokeling during the study of the Talmud.

I consider that an emotional and or physical response helps memory retention so sometimes when I'm practicing a language I will shake a fist, make bird head movements, flap my arms, high five, pump my fist or yell out (and no, I do not have any neuro-motor reasons to be doing that, I'm as neuro-typical as vanilla ice cream). Either that or I'm lying down with my eyes closed. But I can tell you that in the car, driving around town doing Pimsleur I've gotten some strange looks.

I also apparently have created a giant black hole of shameful behaviour for my kids. I sort of enjoy that aspect too.
1 x
I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar

StringerBell
Brown Belt
Posts: 1035
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:30 am
Languages: English (n)
Italian
x 3289

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby StringerBell » Tue Feb 26, 2019 11:48 pm

When I learn a new verb in another language, I try to "do it" while saying the word. So if I'm trying to learn a verb that means "to step backward", I take a step backward while I'm saying it out loud. Or I say the verb "to smile" while I'm smiling. It feels stupid to do, but it works really well.
2 x
Season 4 Lucifer Italian transcripts I created: https://learnanylanguage.fandom.com/wik ... ranscripts

Cainntear
Black Belt - 3rd Dan
Posts: 3468
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:04 am
Location: Scotland
Languages: English(N)
Advanced: French,Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Intermediate: Italian, Catalan, Corsican
Basic: Welsh
Dabbling: Polish, Russian etc
x 8657
Contact:

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby Cainntear » Wed Feb 27, 2019 12:26 am

I never read the primary research on this, but I've been told that studies on people who went through TPR found that they overused imperative forms in their target language and were perceived as rude. The findings seemed pretty unsurprising and uncontroversial, so I never saw a need to look it up.

Which isn't to say that TPR is bad, just that you should only use it for a very limited time as part of a much broader programme. The same is true of almost every technique in teaching: one technique does not make a method.
4 x

romeo.alpha
Yellow Belt
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:22 pm
Languages: Speaks: English (native), Swiss German (native), High German, French, Dutch (heritage)
Learning: Greek, Japanese, Egyptian Arabic
x 43

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby romeo.alpha » Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:12 am

Cainntear wrote:I never read the primary research on this, but I've been told that studies on people who went through TPR found that they overused imperative forms in their target language and were perceived as rude. The findings seemed pretty unsurprising and uncontroversial, so I never saw a need to look it up.

Which isn't to say that TPR is bad, just that you should only use it for a very limited time as part of a much broader programme. The same is true of almost every technique in teaching: one technique does not make a method.


Two ideas come to mind to moderate this. One is to describe it. Teacher first says "I stand up" and stands up, students all stand up and teacher says "we stand up" (and eventually stood up and so on). The other would be to include "please" or "let's" or an equivalent with all imperatives. In some languages formulating the instruction as a question, or making use of the subjunctive could work as well.
0 x

Cainntear
Black Belt - 3rd Dan
Posts: 3468
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:04 am
Location: Scotland
Languages: English(N)
Advanced: French,Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Intermediate: Italian, Catalan, Corsican
Basic: Welsh
Dabbling: Polish, Russian etc
x 8657
Contact:

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby Cainntear » Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:45 pm

romeo.alpha wrote:
Cainntear wrote:I never read the primary research on this, but I've been told that studies on people who went through TPR found that they overused imperative forms in their target language and were perceived as rude. The findings seemed pretty unsurprising and uncontroversial, so I never saw a need to look it up.

Which isn't to say that TPR is bad, just that you should only use it for a very limited time as part of a much broader programme. The same is true of almost every technique in teaching: one technique does not make a method.


Two ideas come to mind to moderate this. One is to describe it. Teacher first says "I stand up" and stands up, students all stand up and teacher says "we stand up" (and eventually stood up and so on).

Except that that is situationally very weird, because you're not actually modelling any real world language use, meaning the purpose of the grammatical structures is not clear.
It then becomes a vocabulary lesson, because the vocab is the only thing that is presented alongside the concept it genuinely represents.
The other would be to include "please" or "let's" or an equivalent with all imperatives. In some languages formulating the instruction as a question, or making use of the subjunctive could work as well.

It still focuses on far too narrow a range of grammatical functions for students to be expected to master the breadth of the language.

Don't get me wrong, I have used TPR-style techniques in class on various occasions, and I find them very helpful, particularly when teaching concepts like prepositions of place (e.g. Put the penguin in the box. Put the giraffe on the box. Put the cat under the box.)

As I said, no one technique can be a complete method, and no self-described TPR teacher ever does pure TPR. If I'm doing a TPR-style lesson, I will also add in questions of increasing complexity, starting with yes/no questions (is the penguin under the box?) and moving on to more open questions (where is the penguin?).
There's really no point trying to fight to make something fit the pattern that doesn't naturally fit, when there are plenty of other techniques that will better suit the language point being taught.
1 x

User avatar
zenmonkey
Black Belt - 2nd Dan
Posts: 2528
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: California, Germany and France
Languages: Spanish, English, French trilingual - German (B2/C1) on/off study: Persian, Hebrew, Tibetan, Setswana.
Some knowledge of Italian, Portuguese, Ladino, Yiddish ...
Want to tackle Tzotzil, Nahuatl
Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=859
x 7030
Contact:

Re: Total Physical Response (TPR)

Postby zenmonkey » Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:07 pm

Cainntear wrote:As I said, no one technique can be a complete method, and no self-described TPR teacher ever does pure TPR. If I'm doing a TPR-style lesson, I will also add in questions of increasing complexity, starting with yes/no questions (is the penguin under the box?) and moving on to more open questions (where is the penguin?)


Heck, even I do TPR style stuff with my daughters - Cat in the Hat was definitely read like that for ages... except I never called it TPR.
0 x
I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar


Return to “General Language Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests