Suggested Change for SC rules (2018)

Ongoing language-learning challenges, and team challenge logs (but not individual logs)
User avatar
reineke
Black Belt - 3rd Dan
Posts: 3570
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:34 pm
Languages: Fox (C4)
Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=6979
x 6554

Re: Suggested Change for SC rules

Postby reineke » Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:25 pm

luke wrote:
1,000,000 mark is nice, round, challenging, achievable, and extensible.

Using "words" and "seconds" would eliminate some of the confusion of calling a number of pages a book when it's not, or saying something is not a book when it is. (The "reading unit" helps, but that still invites questions like, "what is a reading unit")?

Reading a million words, is a recognizable achievement. Listening to 1,000,000 seconds is also a feat.

The word/second approach would leave room for people doing double, triple, and greater challenges.

Forum members would have to decide if the competitive angle helps them. Personally, the achievement in and of itself is enough for me. Competition doesn't add anything to my motivation, but I do recall posts in which someone was inspired to push harder to keep their rank.

A non-terminating challenge would also be interesting. Just like posts accumulate over time, words or seconds could continue to accumulate. Language learning is often a non-terminating activity. ;)


rdearman wrote:
NoManches wrote:So I think the idea of allowing people to read the EQUIVALENT of 100 books and allowing people to watch the EQUIVALENT of 100 movies is a good idea.

Yes, but my point is. What is the definition of a book?

If the lower range is 75k, then with 250 words per page then a "book" is 300 pages. We currently use 50 pages for a book.


"According to Amazon’s great Text Stats feature, the median length for all books is about 64,000 words. The figure was found through looking at a number of books’ text stats, until “Brave New World”‘s 64,531 word count landed in the exact center of all books–50% of books have fewer words and 50% of books have more words."

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/ ... 34636.html

Audiobooks/movies can also be counted/estimated in terms of words as well and I think this is more meaningful than "seconds". If you're using a time measure minutes make more sense. Reading can also be measured in minutes and that would take care of cases where someone's working intensively on difficult texts, putting in a lot of work but churning out few "pages".

Audiovisual material should not be called "films".

Hopefully you can make something of this:

"In order to encounter all the 3000 most frequent words in English 1, 5, 10 and 20 times, you’d need to read or otherwise meet 47,300, 236,700, 473,000, and 947,000 words, respectively;

- to encounter all the 5000 most frequent words in English 1, 5, 10 and 20 times, you’d need to read or listen to 132,100, 661,000, 1,321,000, and 2,642,000 running words;"

https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... ute#p85227

How much material is needed for minimal, normal, or optimal documentation of a language?

"...one needs close to 100,000 words per individual to have any chance of capturing that individual's entire active lexical range. That would be about 17 real-time hours."

"...I calculate that an hour of transcribed recorded speech contains about 6000 words."

"a desideratum for corpora to be used for close syntactic work would be at least a million words, preferably at least ten million.

Good documentation: A million-word corpus. 150-200 hours of good-quality recorded text, up to about 20 hours per speaker, from a variety of speakers on a variety of topics in a variety of genres."

"The sobering examples of the research experiences ...show that even 100,000,000 words is at least an order of magnitude too small to capture phenomena that, though of low frequency, are in the competence of ordinary native speakers. That would represent at least 20,000 recorded hours."

https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... our#p83292

"At a normal speech rate, speakers produce about 10–15 phonemes per second, corresponding to roughly 5–6 syllables every second or 150 words per minute."
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... ute#p42413

Average speech rates

Presentations: between 100 - 150 wpm for a comfortable pace
Conversational: between 120 - 150 wpm
Audiobooks: between 150 - 160 wpm, which is the upper range that people comfortably hear and vocalise words
https://virtualspeech.com/blog/average- ... per-minute
4 x

User avatar
Brun Ugle
Black Belt - 2nd Dan
Posts: 2273
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:48 pm
Location: Steinkjer, Norway
Languages: English (N), Norwegian (~C1/C2), Spanish (B1/B2), German (A2/B1?), Japanese (very rusty)
Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... 15&t=11484
x 5821
Contact:

Re: Suggested Change for SC rules

Postby Brun Ugle » Sat Apr 28, 2018 6:12 am

This starts on Tuesday. Shouldn’t we have a registration thread by now? And is the page and bot ready to take registrations? The webpage is still showing the results from last time.
4 x

User avatar
Serpent
Black Belt - 3rd Dan
Posts: 3657
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:54 am
Location: Moskova
Languages: heritage
Russian (native); Belarusian, Polish

fluent or close: Finnish (certified C1), English; Portuguese, Spanish, German, Italian
learning: Croatian+, Ukrainian; Romanian, Galician; Danish, Swedish; Estonian
exploring: Latin, Karelian, Catalan, Dutch, Czech, Latvian
x 5178
Contact:

Re: Suggested Change for SC rules

Postby Serpent » Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:01 am

jeffers wrote:I've updated the infographic about what does and doesn't count for the film part of the challenge, because the minimum time for video/audio was allowed to be 10 minutes instead of 15 minutes.

Image

EDIT: can't share from Google drive?
EDIT2: fixed with some help from Jeff Lindqvist.
I don't see the image? :|

@Brun Ugle unfortunately the bot is not ready yet.
2 x
LyricsTraining now has Finnish and Polish :)
Corrections welcome

User avatar
CarlyD
Blue Belt
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 5:44 pm
Location: California, USA
Languages: English (N), Spanish--A2, German--now studying, A2
x 1318

Re: Suggested Change for SC rules

Postby CarlyD » Sat Apr 28, 2018 4:55 pm

Can't we at least start the sign-up process and track everything on paper until the bot is ready for updates? I track everything in my notebook anyway and then post to the bot.
2 x
2024 15,000 pages Reading Challenge--pages: 1131 / 15000

User avatar
rdearman
Site Admin
Posts: 7223
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 4:18 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Languages: English (N)
Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1836
x 23092
Contact:

Re: Suggested Change for SC rules

Postby rdearman » Sat Apr 28, 2018 7:10 pm

I'm not in charge of the SC thread but I know it is being prepared.
4 x
: 0 / 150 Read 150 books in 2024

My YouTube Channel
The Autodidactic Podcast
My Author's Newsletter

I post on this forum with mobile devices, so excuse short msgs and typos.

User avatar
Serpent
Black Belt - 3rd Dan
Posts: 3657
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 10:54 am
Location: Moskova
Languages: heritage
Russian (native); Belarusian, Polish

fluent or close: Finnish (certified C1), English; Portuguese, Spanish, German, Italian
learning: Croatian+, Ukrainian; Romanian, Galician; Danish, Swedish; Estonian
exploring: Latin, Karelian, Catalan, Dutch, Czech, Latvian
x 5178
Contact:

Re: Suggested Change for SC rules

Postby Serpent » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:35 pm

Brun Ugle wrote:Shouldn’t we have a registration thread by now?
CarlyD wrote:Can't we at least start the sign-up process
Done, sorry for the delay. Please PM me if there are any typos/errors or just some weird wording somewhere. Or if you have any suggestions for the main post :)
5 x
LyricsTraining now has Finnish and Polish :)
Corrections welcome


Return to “Language Challenges”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests