It often takes me time to reply, despite the fact I am spending too much time on this forum
Skynet wrote:You never did reply to my post! I am still waiting for your feedback!Subject: My 9 week ultra-intensive French resurrection summer project.Skynet wrote:Cavesa wrote:If you don't mind me asking:
Why are you using only bilingual sources?
-you are not starting from zero, and you find the bilingual resources for beginners "painfully slow"
-you say you mind too much English in your resources
-most of the best French resources I've ever seen are monolingual
-a lot of your courses are very similar to each other
-when it comes to the monolingual resources, it is not true that everything new is not serious and good enough
Cavesa,
In all honesty, I do not mind answering any questions from people,
especially those from certified C2 French sages like you!
To be honest, I am aware that I have 11-year old sedentary high school French in my memory. However, since I intend to get to the C2 level (and not merely plateau at DELF B2 Pro), I want to establish an extremely strong French foundation from which I can ascend the C-level mountain. I do not want to be hubristic and say, "Well, I have photographic memory, so I can teleport to the summit of C2 with no effort and having sole reliance on an inactive French foundation laid over a decade ago." I want the experience of learning a language: from getting blown away by an
RFI Le Journal en Francais Facile F-5 tornado and realising that
I have a feeling that I am NOT in Kansas anymore, to eating a bowl of chicken soup in a 42C (108F) Mediterranean heatwave to recover from a stubborn cold whilst not quitting, to applauding when I was able to transcribe what I heard from Cortina/NFEW/FWOT/Linguaphone 1950 & 1971/Living Language/DLI Basic courses. These trials and triumphs are what make anything
worthwhile.Another reason is that I was never able to find native French courses from Hachette/CLE/Didier for beginners/false-beginners. Everything that I found was
above my paygrade for those at intermediate and advanced levels.
I am afraid that I would have to disagree with you: ALL contemporary revisions/editions of any series in any* language have become
less complex (a euphemism for "dumbed-down"). I have seen this in English and Shona textbooks (made by natives for native speakers) and am confident that this is the case in all languages. I can say, with absolute temerity, that the Czech books that you read in junior school are significantly more complicated than the textbooks in use today. If you picked up the books they are reading today, you would split your sides with laughter.
DISCLAIMER: I would like to believe that outstanding educational systems like those from S. Korea, Japan, Singapore, Finland, Taiwan and Sweden will prove me wrong.
Thanks for your compliments
You're right that building a strong foundation is definitely worth it. However, I think there are more paths to it and the quantity is not always the most important factor. It can even slow you down, if you get stuck there. I have repeatedly fallen into this trap of trying to o too much and getting too bored and discouraged.
No, you are not correct that ALL the contemporary resources are less complex. It is unfortunately common but not that universal. Also, there are completely new courses that are not remakes of the old ones and still are rigorous and complex and definitely not dumbed down. Based on my observation,
I would even dare to guess the French course publishers have finally turned around. I think I was learning at the worst time for the intermediate or advanced or just any serious learners of French. Nowadays, they are finally realising there is market for the efficient and serious stuff and also there are many people at the higher levels.
About the not language textbooks (native for native ones on various subjects): nope, the Czech ones are still the same ten or fifteen years later, our schools are too poor to get newer ones
And actually, some of the new editions are better than the older ones, but that depends on the subject and book in question. Sure, schools are being dumbed down but books are not the primary reason or tool. Yes, the language books for kids are horrible these days, ours were less colourful but much more informative and logical. I know what are the kids learning from these days from my own family. What is really missing on our market, however, are high quality references appropriate for the secondary schools. The younger kids in primary schools have a lot of stuff their parents can choose from, the highschoolers also have a lot of stuff. The kids in between have too few types of books to choose from.
So, I don't think the dumbing down phenomenon is that present everywhere. When it comes to the French stuff for learners, I would have definitely agreed five years ago. But not now. I think judging everything just by the year of publication is not a reasonable approach.