Saim wrote:Dagane wrote:I can't help looking for a balanced middle point when I feel a discourse is heavy on one side,
I don't think there is any sort of reasonable "middle point" between competing nationalisms. All nationalism is bad, as you yourself said.
I personally don't care what party you vote for (I don't vote), or what the national identity of people in Treviño is (or, I care about it just as much as I care about the relative proportion of Albanians or Bosniaks and Serbs in different municipalities of Sandžak and Preševo). None of that is relevant to anything I said.The comment on status in Southern Navarre comes because I studied with people from there who lost job opportunities because of the language barrier, when they never even had to study it at school. [...] If you ask me, I don't understand why the interest in national languages other than Spanish is so little. I even think we should all learn either our local dialect/language or another peninsular language.
That's what happens when a language is actually useful, you need it to work in areas where it's spoken in many fields. The first sentence in this quote contradicts the second one. Of course people won't learn a language that won't open up any job opportunities. If you want Basque to be useful and people to want to learn it you should be asking for more of the previous scenario.
If you want Basque to be a "national" language of Spain and not associated with Basque nationalism then it needs to be absolutely indispensable in parts of Spain, just as French is indispensable in parts of Switzerland despite not being the numerical majority in the whole country.In my region, there is a city which has never been part of a Basque province except for about 60 years some 3 centuries ago (and then, never Basque speaking).
This is simply false. Basque died out in Treviño at the same time as the adjoining area of Alaba. It's not true that Treviño was "never" Basque speaking, just as this is not true of Logroño, Huesca or Pau.Some articles about Aranese positions do leak into Spanish news on and off, but then you will accuse me of presenting the Spanish viewpoint, so I avoided the point altogether.
I'm making the factual argument that this claim is untrue. If you want to disprove me using these articles cite them. But make sure the articles support the claim you actually made: "speakers [of Aranese] often complain to the Catalan government [presumably about something related to language policy]", and not something irrelevant about political parties, medieval kingdoms or national identities.
Hi Sam,
I agree that a language is useful because it is used, and I support the idea that you must learn it to have better job opportunities. I was talking about people from non-Basque speaking areas of Southern Navarre who were not forced to learn Basque and now they find out it became important under a process of making the entire province Basque-speaking.
I never talked about Treviño, nooj just gave an example. I haven't even been there! That's not where I am from and I was referring to a city were Basque population is recent and Basque nationalist parties are minor. But they exist, since recent times only because of the population switft.
EDIT: I will stop answering because the discussion is heating up and I am preparing for an exam tomorrow. And also because positions supporting nationalisms (not that you have them) are always extreme and there is no dialogue.
Bottom line on my side: all language variants are beautiful and should be encouraged at all levels including school, university and administration, regardless of whether they are called national languages, regional languages or dialects, and politics are to blame when that doesn't happen. On a second thought, I firmly believe languages should not be associated with any ideology, whatever it may be. That only creates separation and elitism and prevent people with different ideologies from learning them. That's what prompted my comment. And that happens far too often, particularly in Spain. I didn't intend to convince anybody of anything or to open a political debate.