Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Resources:
Duration: 16:01
New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
- jeff_lindqvist
- Black Belt - 3rd Dan
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 9:52 pm
- Languages: sv, en
de, es
ga, eo
---
fi, yue, ro, tp, cy, kw, pt, sk - Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2773
- x 10438
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
5 x
Leabhair/Greannáin léite as Gaeilge:
Ar an seastán oíche:Oileán an Órchiste
Duolingo - finished trees: sp/ga/de/fr/pt/it
Finnish with extra pain :
Llorg Blog - Wiki - Discord
Ar an seastán oíche:
Duolingo - finished trees: sp/ga/de/fr/pt/it
Finnish with extra pain :
Llorg Blog - Wiki - Discord
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3077
- Contact:
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
Here he says "The most important thing I've learned in my own studies of Korean was...classical Chinese characters - in order to understand vocabulary; you can't learn it without it". This is 100% false, and it amazes me that he is still sticking to his guns over something that hasn't been true for perhaps 20 years now.jeff_lindqvist wrote:Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Resources:
4 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
-
- Blue Belt
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:21 pm
- Languages: English (N), German, Japanese, Mandarin, Korean
- x 1373
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
leosmith wrote:Here he says "The most important thing I've learned in my own studies of Korean was...classical Chinese characters - in order to understand vocabulary; you can't learn it without it". This is 100% false, and it amazes me that he is still sticking to his guns over something that hasn't been true for perhaps 20 years now.
Agreed. Although I do think a weaker version of this claim is true, namely that knowing the characters facilitates vocabulary acquisition considerably.
4 x
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3077
- Contact:
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
The analogy that I hear often is that it's like knowing Latin and Greek roots for English learners. It facilitates, but acquiring them takes time, so I'm not sure it's worth it to a learner to learn these rather than spend that time elsewhere. That being said, I had a background in Chinese characters when I started Korean, and I think that knowledge helped me a little bit.lichtrausch wrote:knowing the characters facilitates vocabulary acquisition considerably.
I personally wouldn't advise people with no background in Chinese characters to learn them for the purpose of learning Korean, which is what I believe the professor is doing.
4 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
- rdearman
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 4:18 pm
- Location: United Kingdom
- Languages: English (N)
- Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1836
- x 23092
- Contact:
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
The only thing my mandarin studies helped me with in Korean has been Korean -sino numbers.
0 x
: Read 150 books in 2024
My YouTube Channel
The Autodidactic Podcast
My Author's Newsletter
I post on this forum with mobile devices, so excuse short msgs and typos.
My YouTube Channel
The Autodidactic Podcast
My Author's Newsletter
I post on this forum with mobile devices, so excuse short msgs and typos.
-
- Orange Belt
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:06 pm
- Location: Canada
- Languages: English (native). Korean (upper intermediate). French (early intermediate), Japanese (early beginner)
- Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... 15&t=19516
- x 359
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
I bought https://play.google.com/store/books/aut ... iho%20Choo thinking breaking down words into components might help me. Turned out, not so much. I'd rather waste a few bucks trying that than a year learning Chinese characters and finding out the same thing.
0 x
-
- Green Belt
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 5:53 am
- Languages: English (N), French, Japanese, Spanish, Mandarin, Korean
- Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... 15&t=18968
- x 759
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
leosmith wrote:The analogy that I hear often is that it's like knowing Latin and Greek roots for English learners.
My experience as someone with knowledge of at least one reading of ~2500 Japanese characters and just under 1000 Mandarin characters under his belt going to Korean has been less like what you’re describing and more like knowing French and then going to Spanish (or perhaps Romanian would be a more apt example, but I haven’t studied Romanian). The words definitely aren’t quite the same, but the similarities are striking, especially once you start to notice the patterns. I can often guess a word’s meaning, or at least the characters, before I’m told what the word is. And if I can’t do that, looking up the characters of the word usually gives me a little eureka moment that helps it stick.
Would I recommend learning Hanja if you’re just starting out and don’t have any background knowledge? No way, unless you’re interested and then have at it! From what I can gather, it does sound like you will at some point need a few dozen to maybe even a couple hundred characters to get by in Korea and truly understand everything around you though, as many characters do find there way into news headlines, subtitles on variety TV shows, store signs, etc. And even Koreans know quite a few characters even when they claim otherwise. But this is only for a complete understanding on par with natives.
I think this is an interesting video on the subject https://youtu.be/1H5QTZIC-QI, especially the interviews that start at around the 4 minute mark.
1 x
-
- White Belt
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2023 5:59 pm
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (Inter)
German (Beg)
French (Beg) - x 130
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
leosmith wrote:Here he says "The most important thing I've learned in my own studies of Korean was...classical Chinese characters - in order to understand vocabulary; you can't learn it without it". This is 100% false, and it amazes me that he is still sticking to his guns over something that hasn't been true for perhaps 20 years now.jeff_lindqvist wrote:Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Resources:
He has always pursued languages with such a literary/historical/humanities aim. I wonder if that is what he has in mind.
2 x
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3077
- Contact:
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
This is possible. Maybe he really meant "you can't learn it to the degree I learn it without it".zjfict wrote:He has always pursued languages with such a literary/historical/humanities aim. I wonder if that is what he has in mind.
2 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3077
- Contact:
Re: New Prof Argüelles Youtube Series
I knew about the same number of Kanji as you, but maybe four or five times as many Hanzi, and time-wise it wasn’t anything like learning French from a base of Spanish (I guess I went the opposite direction you did). Maybe you didn’t mean time-wise; maybe you meant something like similar grammar (mostly Japanese), similar vocabulary (like 大学 = だいがく/dàxué/대학교), etc. But imo the critical metric for language difficulty is time. It took me about three to four times as long to reach an upper intermediate in Korean (given my Japanese and Mandarin base) as it did in French (given my Spanish base).Sizen wrote:My experience as someone with knowledge of at least one reading of ~2500 Japanese characters and just under 1000 Mandarin characters under his belt going to Korean has been less like what you’re describing and more like knowing French and then going to Spanish
As I mentioned earlier, it helps a little bit, obv more so in Korea than learning in a vacuum, but you definitely don’t “need it to get by”. And learning 100-200, like the guy suggests in the linked video, is quite a bit more reasonable than what the professor used to recommend (I think he said one or two thousand...can’t find the post).Sizen wrote:From what I can gather, it does sound like you will at some point need a few dozen to maybe even a couple hundred characters to get by in Korea
0 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
Return to “General Language Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests