It depends on the person. Me for example, when I put my level I only put it for passive skills. Something else I used to do was put a level on my profile one higher than it was to motivate me more to reach that level and do more work to reach it.
I don't really think it's a big problem. If it gets people interested in their studies and motivates them then go for it. I don't think anyone here feels like they have anything to prove to anyone else anyway.
Why do people lie about level ?
-
- Green Belt
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 6:25 pm
- Location: USA
- Languages: _
NA: English
C2: French
C1: German, Italian, Spanish
B2: Russian, Portuguese
A2: Japanese
A1: Mandarin - Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=751
- x 631
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3158
- Contact:
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
1 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
-
- Blue Belt
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:04 pm
- Languages: Russian (N)
- x 1910
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
LesRonces wrote:Reading through some older threads on here, i've recently noticed several members who had language skills at B1, B2, etc, some even had them in the A's, just months ago, and now they are saying that they're C2 etc.
I don't believe this is possible and wonder why people would lie ?
One person said they were A2 like 2 months ago and now say they're C1 etc.
Is this an overestimation of skill, self confidence or just fibbing ?
I wouldn't call it a "lie" (or maybe I just prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt ).
In my case all those A2, B1 or C1, etc are just a way of speaking and a lame attempt of assessment my own skills. The only reason why, for example, I assume that my passive skills (reading, listening) are somewhere about C level is the fact that I have no, or very little, problems to understand native (English) books, series, movies, news. But at the same time I know that my active skills (writing, speaking) are far behind, probably A2-B1.
And either way, since my TL is English, I'm giving out my real level in my every post here . So if I overstate my level it means that I'm just mistaken and wrongly understand those levels .
1 x
- blaurebell
- Blue Belt
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:24 pm
- Location: Spain
- Languages: German (N), English (C2), Spanish (B2-C1), French (B2+ passive), Italian (A2), Russian (Beginner)
- Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=3235
- x 2240
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
Well, I don't know, the Dialang test told me the other day that my reading comprehension in French is C2 now, but obviously I haven't changed my profile to match that because I don't think it's accurate. Until I feel ready to tackle French philosophy I'm not yet at C2 comprehension. I tend to underestimate rather than overestimate.
As for A2 to C1 in a couple of months, that's totally possible if this is just fluency. That can really be super fast. I think when I moved to England my English speaking skills jumped from a rusty high B1 to C1 in about 3 weeks because I could write at that level already and just had to get used to producing correct English sentences "on a deadline". C2 speaking and discussing complex philosophical topics from there was about a year of total immersion with really heavy university courses though, the kind of courses where they shove 20,000 pages of core reading down your throat in half a year. I believe that jumping from B2 to C2 hinges on crazy amounts of input and output, like 1500h+ audio, 20,000-30,000 pages reading, 50,000-100,000 words output, hundreds of hours of speaking with adequate feedback, and so on. I'd guess about 2500h+ in an easy language. Even at 7h a day, 50h a week, that takes a about a year.
As for A2 to C1 in a couple of months, that's totally possible if this is just fluency. That can really be super fast. I think when I moved to England my English speaking skills jumped from a rusty high B1 to C1 in about 3 weeks because I could write at that level already and just had to get used to producing correct English sentences "on a deadline". C2 speaking and discussing complex philosophical topics from there was about a year of total immersion with really heavy university courses though, the kind of courses where they shove 20,000 pages of core reading down your throat in half a year. I believe that jumping from B2 to C2 hinges on crazy amounts of input and output, like 1500h+ audio, 20,000-30,000 pages reading, 50,000-100,000 words output, hundreds of hours of speaking with adequate feedback, and so on. I'd guess about 2500h+ in an easy language. Even at 7h a day, 50h a week, that takes a about a year.
8 x
: Дэвид Эддингс - В поисках камня
: LWT Known
: FSI Spanish Basic
: GdUdE B
: Duolingo reverse Spanish -> German
: LWT Known
: FSI Spanish Basic
: GdUdE B
: Duolingo reverse Spanish -> German
-
- White Belt
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:28 pm
- Languages: English, French, Spanish, Portuguese
Learning: Japanese - x 35
- Contact:
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
LesRonces wrote:One person said they were A2 like 2 months ago and now say they're C1 etc.
Is this an overestimation of skill, self confidence or just fibbing ?
Maybe they underestimated their skills when they said they were A2.
6 x
- aokoye
- Black Belt - 1st Dan
- Posts: 1818
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 6:14 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Languages: English (N), German (~C1), French (Intermediate), Japanese (N4), Swedish (beginner), Dutch (A2)
- Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... 15&t=19262
- x 3310
- Contact:
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
I think very few people are knowingly lying. I think it's more an issue of people not actually knowing what level they are, applying CEFR levels to languages where they are rarely applied (Japanese and Manderin for example), or grossly over or underestimating their skill levels.
There's also the case of people entering in levels for specific skills. My listening level of German is likely a high C1 but my reading is around B2.
There's also the case of people entering in levels for specific skills. My listening level of German is likely a high C1 but my reading is around B2.
3 x
Prefered gender pronouns: Masculine
- IronMike
- Black Belt - 2nd Dan
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 6:13 am
- Location: Northern Virginia
- Languages: Studying: Esperanto
Maintaining: nada
Tested:
BCS, 1+L/1+R (DLPT5, 2022)
Russian, 3/3 (DLPT5, 2022) 2+ (OPI, 2022)
German, 2L/1+R (DLPT5, 2021)
Italian, 1L/2R (DLPT IV, 2019)
Esperanto, C1 (KER skriba ekzameno, 2017)
Slovene, 2+L/3R (DLPT II in, yes, 1999) - Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5189
- x 7266
- Contact:
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
I only put the levels that I've tested in. If I'm guessing at my level, I put a question mark next to the language.
0 x
You're not a C1 (or B1 or whatever) if you haven't tested.
CEFR --> ILR/DLPT equivalencies
My swimming life.
My reading life.
CEFR --> ILR/DLPT equivalencies
My swimming life.
My reading life.
- IronMike
- Black Belt - 2nd Dan
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 6:13 am
- Location: Northern Virginia
- Languages: Studying: Esperanto
Maintaining: nada
Tested:
BCS, 1+L/1+R (DLPT5, 2022)
Russian, 3/3 (DLPT5, 2022) 2+ (OPI, 2022)
German, 2L/1+R (DLPT5, 2021)
Italian, 1L/2R (DLPT IV, 2019)
Esperanto, C1 (KER skriba ekzameno, 2017)
Slovene, 2+L/3R (DLPT II in, yes, 1999) - Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5189
- x 7266
- Contact:
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
LesRonces wrote:IronMike wrote:I only put the levels that I've tested in. If I'm guessing at my level, I put a question mark next to the language.
So you're tested C1 in Russian ? That's pretty impressive !!
Yeah, C1 in reading. Strong B2 in listening and speaking.
0 x
You're not a C1 (or B1 or whatever) if you haven't tested.
CEFR --> ILR/DLPT equivalencies
My swimming life.
My reading life.
CEFR --> ILR/DLPT equivalencies
My swimming life.
My reading life.
- Systematiker
- Blue Belt
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2016 6:09 pm
- Languages: ENG (N); DEU (C2+) // SWG (~C1); BAR (~C1); SPA (4/3); FRA (~C1); SCO (~C1); NLD (~B2*); LAT (Latinum Bavaricum); GRC (Graecum Bavaricum); CAT (~B2*); POR (~B2*); SWE (~B2*); HBO (Hebraicum); DAN (~B1*); RUS (~A2); KOR (~A1); FAS (still a raw beginner)
*Averaged for high receptive skill - Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=7332
- x 2071
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
Many of mine are estimates - that's why I've got a ~ next to it. I also average for a pretty significant gap between receptive and productive. I've only got flat statements where I've tested.
That said, it may be that some people underestimate, overestimate, get a misleading test, or just want to be cool. I mean, we're the cool kids, right?
That said, it may be that some people underestimate, overestimate, get a misleading test, or just want to be cool. I mean, we're the cool kids, right?
1 x
-
- Green Belt
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:37 pm
- Languages: English (N), Korean (~A2)
- x 400
Re: Why do people lie about level ?
Dunning-Kruger effect, poor gradings from study companions and courses, misinterpretation of statistics... all contributors no doubt.
But I think, personally, everyone likes to stand on their soapbox and preach to other people. We're all opinionated and to some degree life can be frustrating when others point out our shortcomings and jump on their soapboxes. The internet lets you choose to hide your shortcomings, you can kind of pretend to be more than (or at least different to) the person you are...
The problem with pretending, especially when statistics are involved, is that it turns out to be an arms race and it gets a little ridiculous. "You learn 50 words a day? Well I don't want to feel like I'm behind so I'm going to say I'm easily learning 100 a day".
So I parse everything I read online through the filter of "this person may not actually have the 'credentials' to back up their statement. they are likely stating opinion as fact".
But I think, personally, everyone likes to stand on their soapbox and preach to other people. We're all opinionated and to some degree life can be frustrating when others point out our shortcomings and jump on their soapboxes. The internet lets you choose to hide your shortcomings, you can kind of pretend to be more than (or at least different to) the person you are...
The problem with pretending, especially when statistics are involved, is that it turns out to be an arms race and it gets a little ridiculous. "You learn 50 words a day? Well I don't want to feel like I'm behind so I'm going to say I'm easily learning 100 a day".
So I parse everything I read online through the filter of "this person may not actually have the 'credentials' to back up their statement. they are likely stating opinion as fact".
0 x
Return to “General Language Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests