Dylan95 wrote:Turkish and Japanese. Potentially Swahili or Indonesian as well.
Remove them? Or add them?
Dylan95 wrote:Turkish and Japanese. Potentially Swahili or Indonesian as well.
rdearman wrote:Dylan95 wrote:Turkish and Japanese. Potentially Swahili or Indonesian as well.
Remove them? Or add them?
The UN replaced the the League of Nations. The official languages of the League of Nations were English and French, the additional languages of the UN may have been a response to the experience acquired during the operation of that organisation.sillygoose1 wrote:They don't really say how they come to choose them. I'm assuming it was based off of first the Allies main languages of WWII (English, French, Russian), then they chose the others to account for how many countries each was spoken in and by how many people.
"How were the official languages chosen?
Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish have been official languages since the founding of the United Nations in 1945 (General Assembly Resolution 2 (1) of 1 February 1946, Annex, paragraph 1). English and French have been the United Nations’ working languages since the same time. Arabic was added as an official language by a decision of the General Assembly in its resolution 3190 (XXVIII) of 18 December 1973."
Cavesa wrote:I think people are not after the UN languages, as the UN is simply less attractive as something to identify with. I am definitely not gonna enter any discussion on what is the purpose or agenda of the UN on this forum, neither for it or against it. But it is obvious the UN doesn't bring the "I am a unitednationer" sentiment, which would attract language learners to learn the six languages. "I am european" is an identity bringing people to learn the EU languages, at least a few of them. There are other examples but this is the best one.There are also people identifying with or passioned about the middle east, the mediteranean, scandinavia, southeast asia, the former A-U empire, and so on. The UN is simply too distant from the individual people to evoke such an emotion.
Ser wrote:Cavesa wrote:I think people are not after the UN languages, as the UN is simply less attractive as something to identify with. I am definitely not gonna enter any discussion on what is the purpose or agenda of the UN on this forum, neither for it or against it. But it is obvious the UN doesn't bring the "I am a unitednationer" sentiment, which would attract language learners to learn the six languages. "I am european" is an identity bringing people to learn the EU languages, at least a few of them. There are other examples but this is the best one.There are also people identifying with or passioned about the middle east, the mediteranean, scandinavia, southeast asia, the former A-U empire, and so on. The UN is simply too distant from the individual people to evoke such an emotion.
What is "the former A-U empire"? The Austro-hUngarian Empire? The Abbasid & Umayyad Caliphates? I looked at Wikipedia's List of empires and I couldn't find something matching well.
...
Austro-Ugarska (na nemačkom Österreich-Ungarn, na mađarskom Osztrák-Magyar Monarchia) bila je centralnoevropska država od 1867. do 1918. godine...
badger wrote:if English is to be kept, it should be spoken in an amusing/incomprehensible local accent/dialect - West Country, Brummie, Geordie, Glaswegian, etc. - on a weekly-rotating basis.
Return to “General Language Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests