Archaeology, Genetics, and Language in the Steppes: A Comment on Bomhard
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 10:34 pm
https://www.academia.edu/39985565/Archa ... on_Bomhard
Archaeology, Genetics, and Language in the Steppes: A Comment on Bomhard
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 2019
David Anthony
--------------------------------------
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com
The PIE homeland controversy: August 2019 status report
.....................
Uralic urheimat
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showth ... 147&page=4
Archaeology, Genetics, and Language in the Steppes: A Comment on Bomhard
Journal of Indo-European Studies, 2019
David Anthony
This paper reviews ancient human DNA from sites around the Black Sea and the Pontic-Caspian steppes in order to clarify the genetic evolution of the Yamnaya population in the steppes, and to connect the genetic evidence from Yamnaya and pre-Yamnaya Eneolithic mating networks with archaeologically defined groups. The overall purpose is to analyze A. Bomhard's hypothesis that Proto-Indo-European was a contact language that developed from interference between a pre-Northwest Caucasian type of language and a pre-Proto-Uralic type of language. I was asked to evaluate this linguistic hypothesis from genetic and archaeological perspectives.
--------------------------------------
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com
The PIE homeland controversy: August 2019 status report
Archeologist David Anthony has a new paper out on the Indo-European homeland debate titled Archaeology, Genetics, and Language in the Steppes: A Comment on Bomhard. It's part of a series of articles dealing with Allan R. Bomhard's "Caucasian substrate hypothesis" in the latest edition of The Journal of Indo-European Studies.
.....................
Uralic urheimat
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showth ... 147&page=4