Jean-Luc wrote:They are a lot of differences between Slavic languages. Bulgarian is easier than Russian and easy if you have a knowledge of Russian. Polish is a non Cyrillic slavic language (but Cyrillic is a 15 days' learning problem learning Russian...)
The same way Korean with a "syllabic Hangul alphabet" is by far easier than Chinese.
Russian grammar (German is easy compared to) has a lot of difficulties with verbs'aspects and declensions and Chinese is so easy in that field.
In short all languages have difficulties and facilities. Forget about comparing and start instead learning the one that attracts you
About tones, yes you need them or you will say another word. The best way to learn Chinese is to avoid pinyin at start and even tons' marks to dive in the Chinese language (but with the right methode) and train your ears.
Tones are vital:https://www.thoughtco.com/understanding-mandarin-chinese-tones-688244
Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
- Jean-Luc
- Orange Belt
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:12 am
- Location: Europe
- Languages: French (N), English & German (C), Italian & Spanish (B), Russian, Chinese, Croatian (A)
- x 165
- Contact:
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
Last edited by Jean-Luc on Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
- leosmith
- Brown Belt
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:06 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Languages: English (N)
Spanish (adv)
French (int)
German (int)
Japanese (int)
Korean (int)
Mandarin (int)
Portuguese (int)
Russian (int)
Swahili (int)
Tagalog (int)
Thai (int) - x 3158
- Contact:
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
aquarius wrote:Which one did you find more diffucult to learn? And which type of difficulty did you prefer dealing with?
Hi aquarius. Russian vs Chinese: Chinese was more difficult for me, mostly due to the writing system. Russian grammar was extremely difficult for me though, and to be honest I enjoy the difficulties of Chinese more (nice question btw).
aquarius wrote:Some people say that using the right tone is essential for beeing understood when speaking Chinese, even for a beginner, and others say that's not true. What's your experience about this?
The correct answer is that it depends. For example, are you talking to your teacher, to patient native speakers who meet a lot of foreigners, in a low stress environment, are you talking about simple everyday things? You could probably get away with more mistakes in those cases. But I always encourage people to learn correct pronunciation early on, and that includes tones for Chinese. So the correct thing to to is to treat them as if they are essential.
sherbert wrote:if you don't learn the Hanzi, it won't take as much time to learn Mandarin as Russian
Why would you do that though? Reading really bolsters other language skills; I think it would take me a very long time to achieve a high level in a language I couldn't read in. Or are you planning on converting everything to pinyin maybe?
3 x
https://languagecrush.com/reading - try our free multi-language reading tool
-
- Orange Belt
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:43 pm
- Languages: English (Primary), 普通话 (Mainland Mandarin Chinese, B2)
- x 101
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
I'm surprised no one's expressed discussed tone sandhi before. It's not a big deal compared to how difficult Chinese tones seem to be for non-heritage learners / speakers of tonal languages, but the 3rd tone turns into a 2nd tone when preceding the 3rd tone in a word, and often gets half-clipped depending on the tone succeeding it. Moreover, the Chinese language learning community's noted that grammar becomes more difficult as you advance up, with 口语 / 书面语 distinctions (informal, formal) as well as word use and word locations.
Not insurmountable, just takes a lot of time to achieve sufficient proficiency to open up the People's Daily.
Not insurmountable, just takes a lot of time to achieve sufficient proficiency to open up the People's Daily.
0 x
- IronMike
- Black Belt - 2nd Dan
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 6:13 am
- Location: Northern Virginia
- Languages: Studying: Esperanto
Maintaining: nada
Tested:
BCS, 1+L/1+R (DLPT5, 2022)
Russian, 3/3 (DLPT5, 2022) 2+ (OPI, 2022)
German, 2L/1+R (DLPT5, 2021)
Italian, 1L/2R (DLPT IV, 2019)
Esperanto, C1 (KER skriba ekzameno, 2017)
Slovene, 2+L/3R (DLPT II in, yes, 1999) - Language Log: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5189
- x 7266
- Contact:
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
Did someone change the title of this thread or was it always "lerning" instead of "learning"?!
0 x
You're not a C1 (or B1 or whatever) if you haven't tested.
CEFR --> ILR/DLPT equivalencies
My swimming life.
My reading life.
CEFR --> ILR/DLPT equivalencies
My swimming life.
My reading life.
- Querneus
- Blue Belt
- Posts: 841
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:28 am
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Languages: Speaks: Spanish (N), English
Studying: Latin, French, Mandarin - x 2287
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
IronMike wrote:Did someone change the title of this thread or was it always "lerning" instead of "learning"?!
It always was. Your brain unconsciously corrected the spelling for you before apparently.
1 x
- Random Review
- Green Belt
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 8:41 pm
- Location: UK/Spain/China
- Languages: En (N), Es (int), De (pre-int), Pt (pre-int), Zh-CN (beg), El (beg), yid (beg)
- Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... 75#p123375
- x 919
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
IronMike wrote:Did someone change the title of this thread or was it always "lerning" instead of "learning"?!
It's a subtle distinction only useful for us more advanced beings. For your purposes you can just read it as "learning" without losing too much.
1 x
German input 100 hours by 30-06:
Spanish input 200 hours by 30-06:
German study 50 hours by 30-06:
Spanish study 200 hours by 30-06:
Spanish conversation 100 hours by 30-06:
Spanish input 200 hours by 30-06:
German study 50 hours by 30-06:
Spanish study 200 hours by 30-06:
Spanish conversation 100 hours by 30-06:
- reineke
- Black Belt - 3rd Dan
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:34 pm
- Languages: Fox (C4)
- Language Log: https://forum.language-learners.org/vie ... =15&t=6979
- x 6554
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
"Lernen, ohne zu denken, ist eitel; denken, ohne zu lernen, gefährlich."
0 x
- FyrsteSumarenINoreg
- Yellow Belt
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:10 am
- Location: Adriatic
- Languages: Croatian (N), proficient in Brazilian Portuguese, fluent in English (C1 IELTS band 8.0), conversant in Italian and Spanish, learning Norwegian Nynorsk, Bengali & Malayalam
- x 57
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
I think it's easier for an American to learn Croatian or Macedonian than Chinese.
Chinese pronunciation is difficult, even on a segmental level (that is, without tones).
And the script...
50 % of Croatians (in the North and in the West) don't use the pitch accent, pronouncing luka (the port) and Luka (a name)
the same. In China, unfortunately, the simplified tonal system (used in Shanghai) is on the way out.
Chinese pronunciation is difficult, even on a segmental level (that is, without tones).
And the script...
50 % of Croatians (in the North and in the West) don't use the pitch accent, pronouncing luka (the port) and Luka (a name)
the same. In China, unfortunately, the simplified tonal system (used in Shanghai) is on the way out.
0 x
-
- Green Belt
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:44 pm
- Languages: Croatian (N), English (C1), German (beginner)
- x 733
- Contact:
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
FyrsteSumarenINoreg wrote:50 % of Croatians (in the North and in the West) don't use the pitch accent, pronouncing luka (the port) and Luka (a name)
the same. In China, unfortunately, the simplified tonal system (used in Shanghai) is on the way out.
I hoped someone was going to mention this -- the same holds for Slovene.
However, in many villages in Croatia people use different tones and have different rules how stress moves etc so most people are used to hear all kinds of pronunciation.
The same holds for hard-to distinguish pairs (č vs ć, dž vs đ) -- most natives don't distinguish them either. So they are not important for a foreigner.
0 x
Check Easy Croatian (very useful for Bosnian, Montenegrin and Serbian as well)
-
- Blue Belt
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 6:40 am
- Languages: Russian (N)
English - best foreign language
Polish, Spanish - passive advanced
Tatar, German, French, Greek - studying - x 1386
Re: Difficulty of Lerning Chinese vs. difficulty of learning a Slavic language
Daniel N. wrote:I hoped someone was going to mention this -- the same holds for Slovene.
Modern Standard Slovene has also lost the distinctive phonemic vowel length.
The two main Baltic languages (related to Slavic, but not the same) - Latvian and Lithuanian - traditionally have a pitch accent system as well, but it's also on its way out (especially among the urban speakers).
Will Swedish and Norwegian follow suit?
0 x
Return to “General Language Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests