Questions about Dutch sentences

Ask specific questions about your target languages. Beginner questions welcome!
User avatar
tarvos
Brown Belt
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 11:13 am
Location: Hollandiában
Languages: Native: Dutch, English
Expert: French, Russian, Swedish, German, Romanian, Esperanto, Spanish
Advanced: Italian, Mandarin, Portuguese, Greek, Czech, Norwegian
Intermediate: Hebrew, Icelandic, Hungarian
Beginner: Breton, Korean, Finnish, Polish, Japanese, Bulgarian
Read-only: Danish, Latin, Afrikaans
Language Log: http://how-to-learn-any-language.com/fo ... PN=1&TPN=1
x 1707
Contact:

Re: Questions about Dutch sentences

Postby tarvos » Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:52 am

Almost all of those sentences also contain other mistakes. It's just bad grammar.
1 x
To polyglotism and beyond.
Preferred pronouns: feminine.

User avatar
tommus
Green Belt
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:59 pm
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Languages: English (N), French (B2), Dutch (B2), German (A1), Spanish (A1), Esperanto (A1)
x 454

Re: Questions about Dutch sentences

Postby tommus » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:54 am

"Nog niet eerder konden we het maantje – dat veel wegheeft van een vliegende schotel – van zo dichtbij bewonderen."
Never before could we admire the little moon, that very much resembles a flying saucer, from so close by.

Source: Scientias article

If we just wanted to say:

The little moon very much resembles a flying saucer.

Could it be:

Het maantje wegheeft veel van een vliegende schotel.

I am suspicious that wegheeft is a bit unusual, (and may even be separable). I can only find usages where wegheeft occurs after "dat" or "die" in a subordinate clause. Is the sentence above OK? Is "veel" in the right position?
0 x
Dutch
40 Boeken
● 35 Ned. Videos
● 370 Univ-Nederland
: 22 / 40
: 16 / 35
: 140 / 370
● 730 Video Nieuws
● 104 Skype NL Chats
● 730 Tekst Nieuws
: 430 / 730
: 63 / 104
: 430 / 730

User avatar
vogeltje
Blue Belt
Posts: 843
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 1:13 pm
Location: London
Languages: Belgian French (N)

I can speak: Dutch, German, English, Spanish and understand Italian, Portuguese, Wallonian, Afrikaans, but not always correctly.
x 494

Re: Questions about Dutch sentences

Postby vogeltje » Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 am

tommus wrote:Tarvos, I certainly appreciate all your excellent answers regarding Dutch sentences and expressions.

I had no idea when I began posting these sentences and questions that you would be the only native-Dutch speaker who would be responding. I know there are other native-Dutch speakers and Dutch learners on the Forum. But I guess they are not very active. It sure would be good if there was more Dutch activity. It is kind of lonely.


I tried to help you with some answers before in your thread, but you ignored me, so I stopped writing here.

I'm not Dutch native, but my Dutch is advanced and I knew almost all the answers that tarvos has given you. It's rude to ignore a person who tries to answer your questions, so of course the people won't return.
0 x
-w- I am Jar-ptitsa and my Hawaiian name is ʻā ʻaia
: 1 / 50 Spanish grammar
: 5 / 50 Spanish vocabulary

User avatar
tommus
Green Belt
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:59 pm
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Languages: English (N), French (B2), Dutch (B2), German (A1), Spanish (A1), Esperanto (A1)
x 454

Re: Questions about Dutch sentences

Postby tommus » Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:15 am

"Als we de wintertijd zouden afschaffen zou het extreem lang donker zijn in de ochtend. Maar juist dat ochtendlicht hebben wij mensen hard nodig."
If we eliminated winter time, it would be dark extremely long in the morning. But that very morning light is what [we] people really need.

"extreem" seems to be too strong a word here to describe an extra hour of darkness. Does "extreem" in Dutch have the same degree of extreme that it has in English, or is this sentence maybe exaggerating a bit?

In the second sentence, is "wij" connected with "mensen", meaning "we people"? If so, is "wij mensen" a common expression?

Source: Scientias.nl article
0 x
Dutch
40 Boeken
● 35 Ned. Videos
● 370 Univ-Nederland
: 22 / 40
: 16 / 35
: 140 / 370
● 730 Video Nieuws
● 104 Skype NL Chats
● 730 Tekst Nieuws
: 430 / 730
: 63 / 104
: 430 / 730

User avatar
tarvos
Brown Belt
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 11:13 am
Location: Hollandiában
Languages: Native: Dutch, English
Expert: French, Russian, Swedish, German, Romanian, Esperanto, Spanish
Advanced: Italian, Mandarin, Portuguese, Greek, Czech, Norwegian
Intermediate: Hebrew, Icelandic, Hungarian
Beginner: Breton, Korean, Finnish, Polish, Japanese, Bulgarian
Read-only: Danish, Latin, Afrikaans
Language Log: http://how-to-learn-any-language.com/fo ... PN=1&TPN=1
x 1707
Contact:

Re: Questions about Dutch sentences

Postby tarvos » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:08 am

tommus wrote:"Nog niet eerder konden we het maantje – dat veel wegheeft van een vliegende schotel – van zo dichtbij bewonderen."
Never before could we admire the little moon, that very much resembles a flying saucer, from so close by.

Source: Scientias article

If we just wanted to say:

The little moon very much resembles a flying saucer.

Could it be:

Het maantje wegheeft veel van een vliegende schotel.

I am suspicious that wegheeft is a bit unusual, (and may even be separable). I can only find usages where wegheeft occurs after "dat" or "die" in a subordinate clause. Is the sentence above OK? Is "veel" in the right position?


Nope. This verb is separable, as the stress goes on 'weg' (wéghebben). The correct sentence would be "Het maantje heeft veel weg van een vliegende schotel".

Remember, all verbs with prefixes that have stress on the prefix are separable. When in doubt, check the dictionary as to the stress - it will save you headaches because prefix-based stress always implies a separable verb.

"extreem" seems to be too strong a word here to describe an extra hour of darkness. Does "extreem" in Dutch have the same degree of extreme that it has in English, or is this sentence maybe exaggerating a bit?


Extreem means extreme as in English, but perhaps it's become a more common collocation. But yes, there is some exaggerating going on as well.

In the second sentence, is "wij" connected with "mensen", meaning "we people"? If so, is "wij mensen" a common expression?


Not "we people" but "we humans" or "we as human beings". It refers to us as the collective representatives of humanity. As opposed to, say, a crocodile or a fungus.

Mensen doesn't just mean people in Dutch. "De mens" - "The human". De mensheid "humanity". Menselijk "human". Fouten maken is menselijk "To err is human". Here "wij mensen" rather refers to our human biological necessities. Now I don't exclude the possibility of using people in such a translation, but I find humans would always cover the meaning better than the more doubtful "people" in English to translate your sentence.

"We, the people" would become "Wij, het volk" by the way. People would more often be translated as "mensen" when we talk about what people do in general, or it may be translated as "volk" if we talk about the will of the people.
1 x
To polyglotism and beyond.
Preferred pronouns: feminine.

User avatar
tommus
Green Belt
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:59 pm
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Languages: English (N), French (B2), Dutch (B2), German (A1), Spanish (A1), Esperanto (A1)
x 454

Re: Questions about Dutch sentences

Postby tommus » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:57 am

Tarvos, thanks for those very comprehensive and useful explanations.
0 x
Dutch
40 Boeken
● 35 Ned. Videos
● 370 Univ-Nederland
: 22 / 40
: 16 / 35
: 140 / 370
● 730 Video Nieuws
● 104 Skype NL Chats
● 730 Tekst Nieuws
: 430 / 730
: 63 / 104
: 430 / 730


Return to “Practical Questions and Advice”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests